Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "david(at)lang(dot)hm" <david(at)lang(dot)hm>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-03 17:27:54
Message-ID: 24765.1296754074@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com> writes:
> Hints are not even that complicated to program.

With all due respect, you don't know what you're talking about.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-03 17:28:29 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-03 17:26:00 Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-03 17:28:29 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Shaun Thomas 2011-02-03 17:10:06 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...