Re: [HACKERS] PlPython

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Kevin Jacobs <jacobs(at)penguin(dot)theopalgroup(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PlPython
Date: 2003-06-29 22:21:45
Message-ID: 24757.1056925305@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> The version with patch which removes RExec (as Python 2.x is not
> supporting it ) is the right thoing to do FOR PYTHON 2.X, but there is
> no reason to remove safe execution when using python 1.5.x.

Who's still using 1.5, I guess is the question? And are they likely
to be updating their PG installation when they're not updating Python?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-29 22:25:20 Re: PG crash on simple query
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2003-06-29 21:38:33 Re: [HACKERS] PlPython

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-29 22:29:18 Re: Question about array read using protocol 3.0 implementation in C#
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2003-06-29 21:38:33 Re: [HACKERS] PlPython