From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ERROR: canceling query due to user request |
Date: | 2005-09-13 16:31:03 |
Message-ID: | 24756.1126629063@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> One more thought -- I keep coming back to the fact that when we turn
> on logging in the JDBC driver on the client side, the problem does not
> occur. The only possible reason I can see for this having any affect
> on the problem is the small delay introduced by the synchronous
> logging. Since this is only showing up on commit of a database
> transaction which follows close on the heels of a rollback on the same
> connection, is there any chance that there is some very small
> "settling time" needed for a rollback, and we're sometimes getting in
> ahead of this?
(1) No.
(2) Even if we posit the existence of such a serious bug as that, it
wouldn't explain how control gets to the SIGINT response code.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcin Giedz | 2005-09-13 16:37:20 | Re: plperl again but different problem |
Previous Message | Chris Hoover | 2005-09-13 15:49:02 | Question on vacuuming |