Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Haroon (dot)" <contact(dot)mharoon(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Haroon <muhammad(dot)haroon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Date: 2016-06-25 13:45:45
Message-ID: 2470.1466862345@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Haroon ." <contact(dot)mharoon(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> And if I comment these out i.e. setup_description, setup_privileges and
> 'setup_schema' it seem to progress well without any errors/crashes.

Presumably, what you've done there is remove every single join query
from the post-bootstrap scripts. That isn't particularly useful in
itself, but it does suggest that you would be able to fire up a
normal session afterwards in which you could use a more conventional
debugging approach. The problem can evidently be categorized as
"planning of any join query whatsoever crashes", so a test case
ought to be easy enough to come by.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-06-25 15:15:31 Re: Memory leak in Pl/Python
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-06-25 13:40:58 Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)