From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o |
Date: | 2002-01-18 02:05:15 |
Message-ID: | 2465.1011319515@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am told this was broken in 7.1 too.
Good point. That probably means it's not a "must fix" for 7.2, but
still, it'd be nice to have a solution.
Attached is a diff that seems to actually work in all three pgdump modes
(script output, -Fc, -Ft). A disadvantage of this approach is that
there doesn't seem to be any clean way to issue a DROP for the temp
table, so it will persist in the target database until we finish the
psql script or pg_restore run (or at least until we have to do a
\connect). This would create a problem if the name pgdump_oid
conflicted with any actual table name being restored. We could choose
some more bizarre name to reduce the probability of such a conflict.
A potentially more serious problem is that if the archiving code chooses
to issue other operations between the schema restore and data restore
for the temp table, we might do a \connect and lose the temp table.
Come to think of it, a data-only restore request won't work either.
I had originally tried a single data-only archive entry with copy
command CREATE... COPY. This would avoid the latter two problems.
However, while it seemed to work okay in -Fc mode, -Ft blew up:
$ pg_dump -Ft -b -o test >/tmp/dump.tar
pg_dump: [tar archiver] bad COPY statement - could not find "copy" in string "cr
eate temporary table pgdump_oid (dummy int4);
copy pgdump_oid with oids from stdin;
Philip, is this a fundamental problem, or do we just need to make
the tar archiver a little smarter about looking at the COPY strings?
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 2.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-18 02:07:55 | Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-01-18 01:55:44 | Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny |