Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Paul Lindner <lindner(at)inuus(dot)com>
Cc: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer
Date: 2007-09-29 02:31:36
Message-ID: 24584.1191033096@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Paul Lindner <lindner(at)inuus(dot)com> writes:
> It seems that the driver should immediately deallocate the server-side
> prepared statements it creates for cursors when it finishs fetching
> data for that cursor.

What exactly is the argument here? That no client should use anything
more than the fraction of the FE/BE protocol that pgbouncer currently
supports? Pardon me for not buying into it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2007-09-29 02:40:56 Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer
Previous Message Paul Lindner 2007-09-29 02:15:22 Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer