Re: effective_cache_size is a real?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size is a real?
Date: 2006-07-25 21:16:14
Message-ID: 24515.1153862174@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Point taken, but I'm inclined to convert it to an integer anyway,
> because that will make the units support much easier. The variable is
> only used in exactly one place anyway, so making sure the calculation
> works right should be easy.

Casting it to double shouldn't take many cycles, so go ahead. I assume
you're planning to make the units support handle integer variables only?
I can't see any other float GUC vars where units support would be real
useful ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-07-25 21:20:45 Re: Units in postgresql.conf -- How to report?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-07-25 21:14:13 Change in Pervasive's PostgreSQL strategy