Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Hussey <peter(at)labkey(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem
Date: 2010-08-04 19:20:08
Message-ID: 24449.1280949608@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> There was ample space for keeping the indexes in linux cache (it has 1GB
> cached currently) though the system may have decided to start writing it
> to disk, so I suspect that most of the time was spent copying random
> index pages back and forth between shared buffers and disk cache.

If you're on a platform that has oprofile, you could probably verify
that rather than just guess it ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2010-08-04 19:38:42 Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-08-04 19:18:44 Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem