From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Ricardo Malafaia" <rmalafaia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: polite request about syntax |
Date: | 2006-09-15 14:32:13 |
Message-ID: | 24439.1158330733@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Ricardo Malafaia" <rmalafaia(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Sorry, but "datetime" vs "timestamp with time zone"?! And what about
> the whole function text between $$'s? Yes, better than the '' of some
> time ago, since we don't have to put string literals in the function
> text between '''''s! still...
"timestamp with time zone" is required by the SQL standard. If you'd
like to use "datetime" as an alias for it, a quick CREATE DOMAIN will do
that for you. As for the $$ bit, do you have a constructive suggestion?
> Why are open-source developers so masochist?
You seem to be confusing a database with a point-and-drool GUI. We have
those too (see pgAdmin for instance, or three or four others), but raw
psql is not designed to make Windows users happy.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-09-15 14:34:29 | Re: polite request about syntax |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-09-15 14:31:48 | Re: Release notes |