Re:

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2002-09-11 03:43:11
Message-ID: 24414.1031715791@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> However, there is a problem in that recent changes have made it quite
> likely that an upgrade will fail and will requre the dump script to be
> edited. There are some issues in pg_dump / pg_dumpall that need
> addressing before final release.

AFAIK, we did what we could on that front in 7.2.1. If you have ideas
on how we can retroactively make things better, I'm all ears ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: at 2002-09-10 22:08:00 from Oliver Elphick

Responses

  • Re: at 2002-09-11 03:52:48 from Lamar Owen

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2002-09-11 03:52:48 Re:
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-09-11 03:28:38 Re: Please rename split(text,text,int) to splitpart