Re: full path infrastructure for DT_SONAME?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: full path infrastructure for DT_SONAME?
Date: 2003-08-16 12:18:19
Message-ID: 24307.1061036299@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> Has the idea of putting the infrastructure in place to allow a full pathname
> to be fed to DT_SONAME been totally killed?

What makes you think you need new infrastructure? The HPUX port has
used a full-path rpath for years.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-08-16 12:44:36 Re: New function: epoch_to_timestamp...
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-08-16 04:27:25 Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta