Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 7 May 2012 09:01, Vincent de Phily <vincent(dot)dephily(at)mobile-devices(dot)fr> wrote:
>> Would be nice to see it added to the documentation (unless I just didn't find
>> it ?), as it is quite surprising, and might lead to problems if people expect
>> to be able to read sequence values from the slave.
> If you think so, please submit a patch. That's how it works here.
Any documentation patch should be written by somebody who's actually
researched the behavior a bit; in particular I believe this can be
adjusted with the sequence CACHE setting.
regards, tom lane