Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> This broke the buildfarm on Windows, and I'm not sure of the best way to fix it.
> We currently define read and write permissions in port/win32.h
> specifically for windows. A quick-fix to just add these new ones as
> aliases won't work, because they are used in both open and umask
> calls.
Hm, those symbols are already in use elsewhere in the code; I would
assume it's just a matter of missing #includes in these particular
files. Where does Windows define 'em?
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Dmitriy Igrishin | Date: 2010-12-11 15:28:20 |
| Subject: Re: proposal: auxiliary functions for record type |
| Previous: | From: Florian Pflug | Date: 2010-12-11 15:24:41 |
| Subject: Re: proposal: auxiliary functions for record type |
pgsql-committers by date
| Next: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2010-12-11 16:13:12 |
| Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use symbolic names not octal constants for file permission flags |
| Previous: | From: Robert Haas | Date: 2010-12-11 14:36:25 |
| Subject: pgsql: Allow bidirectional copy messages in streaming replicationmode. |