Re: Random not so random

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: stimits(at)comcast(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Random not so random
Date: 2004-10-04 20:51:46
Message-ID: 2409.1096923106@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"D. Stimits" <stimits(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm. postmaster.c does this during startup of each backend process:
>>
>> gettimeofday(&now, &tz);
>> srandom((unsigned int) now.tv_usec);

> If it uses the same seed from the connection, then all randoms within a
> connect that has not reconnected will use the same seed. Which means the
> same sequence will be generated each time, which is why it is
> pseudo-random and not random. For it to be random not just the first
> call of a new connection, but among all calls of new connection, it
> would have to seed it based on time at the moment of query and not at
> the moment of connect. A pseudo-random generator using the same seed
> will generate the same sequence.

Did you read what I said? Or experiment?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Taber, Mark 2004-10-04 20:55:12 Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 install woes
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2004-10-04 20:47:37 Re: [HACKERS] OT moving from MS SQL to PostgreSQL