| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: missing file in git repo |
| Date: | 2010-04-30 14:25:55 |
| Message-ID: | 24022.1272637555@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Cdric Villemain wrote:
>> 2010/4/30 Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>:
>>> I don't think the git repo was ever considered working for the backbranches
>>> at all...
>>
>> Really ?!
>> Then we have to remove the backbranches from the git.
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Git#Using_Back_Branches
> Yeah, or fix them.
This thread isn't exactly leaving me with a warm fuzzy feeling about
moving the master repository to git. *Why* is the mirror broken, and
what assurances do we have that the problem won't recur in the proposed
transition?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-30 14:38:19 | Re: Invalidating dependent views and functions |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-04-30 13:42:48 | Re: Add column if not exists (CINE) |