| From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension |
| Date: | 2009-09-17 21:26:14 |
| Message-ID: | 23E60DABA5335CA0D1E7EE5A@amenophis |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On 17. September 2009 23:00:12 +0300 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
wrote:
> f the name is a problem, why not change the name? What you are
> proposing above is effectively a very elaborate name change, so why not
> go for a simpler one?
I don't like the solution by using -o "<initdb options>" to push down
command line options to initdb. I always had the opinion that this was (and
is) a valid workaround for postgres itself, but it doesn't feel correct to
expose that further to initdb and its purposes.
My 2 cents...
--
Thanks
Bernd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-17 21:28:16 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: CVS NULL Documentation Clearify documentation of CVS's output of |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-17 21:22:17 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: CVS NULL Documentation Clearify documentation of CVS's output of |