Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods
Date: 2006-11-03 02:46:16
Message-ID: 23913.1162521976@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> ... Why would we reject a piece of useful functionality based on a
> published standard?

Well, size and maintainability of the proposed patch are certainly
factors in any such decision. As a closely related example, I bet
we'd have rejected the original Kerberos-support patch if we'd known
then what we know now. It's been a constant source of bugs ever since
it went in, and with so few users of the feature, it takes a long time
to find the problems.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-11-03 03:49:01 Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-11-03 01:02:24 Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods