| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits |
| Date: | 2009-01-05 18:07:55 |
| Message-ID: | 23777.1231178875@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> So what do we want to do for 8.4? Add 32/64-bit version() indicator and
> add OUT parameters to the TODO list?
+1. There seems a good case for making the 32/64bit distinction
visible somewhere, and the text version string is as good as anyplace.
I think the business about splitting up the string is mostly
lily-gilding, but if someone wants it enough to do it ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen R. van den Berg | 2009-01-05 18:16:58 | Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-05 18:04:14 | Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows) |