From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: monitoring-stats.html documentation |
Date: | 2009-04-04 22:08:01 |
Message-ID: | 23759.1238882881@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/monitoring-stats.html
> says: "Note: blocks_fetched minus blocks_hit gives the number of
> kernel read() calls issued for the table, index, or database; but the
> actual number of physical reads is usually lower due to kernel-level
> buffering." This seems to imply that anything that increases
> blocks_hit should also increase blocks_fetched, but that doesn't seem
> to match the actual behavior.
> rhaas=# select heap_blks_read, heap_blks_hit from pg_statio_user_tables;
It's talking about the underlying pg_stat_get_db_blocks_fetched()
function, not heap_blks_read which is just a view field defined as
pg_stat_get_blocks_fetched(C.oid) -
pg_stat_get_blocks_hit(C.oid) AS heap_blks_read,
Probably that sentence ought to spell out the full function name
instead of abbreviating.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-04 22:25:10 | Re: Review: B-Tree emulation for GIN |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-04-04 21:13:13 | monitoring-stats.html documentation |