Re: State of Beta 2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Date: 2003-09-27 21:20:33
Message-ID: 23747.1064697633@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> With all the discussion and pg_upgrade, I saw no one offer to work on
> it.
> Does someone want to convert it to Perl? I think that would be a better
> language than shell script for this purpose, and C is too low-level.

The reason that it needs to be rewritten in C is that it needs access to
internal stuff that the backend doesn't expose. (For example, the
transaction counter, end-of-WAL pointer, etc.) I don't think Perl would
offer anything except creating an entirely new dependency for Postgres.
Also, C code would be easier to keep in sync with the backend code that
accesses the same stuff.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-27 21:43:48 Re: State of Beta 2
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2003-09-27 20:55:56 Re: State of Beta 2