Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
Date: 2006-02-16 05:39:36
Message-ID: 23618.1140068376@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Quick test:

> create table a(a int primary key, b int, c varchar(200));
> insert into a(a, b, c) values (1,1,'one');
> insert into a(a, b, c) values (2,2,'two');
> insert into a(a, b, c) values (3,1,'one');
> insert into a(a, b, c) values (4,2,'two');

> mysql> select a,b,c from a group by b;
> +---+------+------+
> | a | b | c |
> +---+------+------+
> | 1 | 1 | one |
> | 2 | 2 | two |
> +---+------+------+
> 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)

Egad :-(. At least the SQL spec has some notion of wanting the answer
to a query to be well-defined ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rick Gigger 2006-02-16 07:18:25 Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
Previous Message Chris 2006-02-16 05:07:38 Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"