| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RC1? |
| Date: | 2002-11-13 17:33:50 |
| Message-ID: | 23504.1037208830@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
"Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I don't know anything about how the tests are put together so I'd have
> to look into that before suggesting a way to differentiate my
> system. Having said that wouldn't the 3.3-RELEASE string be
> sufficient?
The mechanism we have in place relies on looking at the output of
config.guess (read the Admin Guide's info about the regression test
resultmap). What does config.guess print for you?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-11-13 18:53:00 | Re: RC1? |
| Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-11-13 17:04:30 | Re: RC1? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-11-13 18:53:00 | Re: RC1? |
| Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-11-13 17:04:30 | Re: RC1? |