From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection |
Date: | 2010-04-21 14:50:24 |
Message-ID: | 23409.1271861424@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> (You might want to look back at the archived discussions about how to
>> avoid storing entries for temp tables in these catalogs; that poses
>> many of the same issues.)
> Do you happen to know what a good search term might be? I tried
> searching for things like "pg_class temp tables" and "pg_class
> temporary tables" and didn't come up with much.
I found this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-07/msg00593.php
I claimed in that message that there were previous discussions but
I did not come across them right away.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-21 14:53:05 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-21 14:49:06 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |