Re: [Slony1-general] Slony1_funcs broken with 8.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Slony1_funcs broken with 8.1
Date: 2005-10-22 17:38:43
Message-ID: 2339.1130002723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> So postmaster doesn't clean up pg_listener,

It never has. If you're complaining about this patch
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-10/msg00073.php
you ought to say so, rather than expecting us to guess it from an
out-of-context quote from another mailing list.

As near as I can tell, the technique Jan describes is an abuse of
pg_listener, and I won't feel any great sympathy when it does break
completely, which it will do before long when pg_listener goes away
in the planned rewrite of LISTEN/NOTIFY.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-22 17:41:56 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-22 17:21:03 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance