Re: gram.y=>preproc.y II

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: gram.y=>preproc.y II
Date: 2008-11-07 20:27:36
Message-ID: 23191.1226089656@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> ... What still needs to be done is beautifying the script (I don't like
> all those static declarations) and removing the remaining changes to gram.y.
> There are only two left (variable handling on quite some places and
> prepared_name twice).

Adding a new production prepared_name for names of prepared statements
doesn't bother me, if you have a need for that. But please get rid of
those renamings of Sconst and Iconst ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2008-11-07 20:32:42 Re: auto_explain contrib moudle
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-11-07 20:26:56 Re: [RRR] Tests citext casts