| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Update on Access 97 and = NULL |
| Date: | 2001-06-14 23:18:26 |
| Message-ID: | 23142.992560706@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
> However, I did find this
> explanation as to why on the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
> http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q237/9/92.ASP
Interesting. Apparently, at this point our "Microsoft-compatible"
hack is arguably *failing* to be Microsoft-compatible.
The KB article is carefully written to make it sound like the only
"foo = NULL" queries out there are mistakes made by users; but wasn't
the original issue that Access97 itself would generate a bogus query?
I'm confused about which component is what here ... what exactly is
the relationship between Access, Jet, MDAC, etc?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Myers | 2001-06-14 23:20:46 | Re: What (not) to do in signal handlers |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-14 23:05:10 | Re: [PATCH] indexability of << operator for inet/cidr |