Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support
Date: 2005-08-25 02:18:38
Message-ID: 22970.1124936318@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I believe so, yes, although I think that we should remove the
> HAVE_GETADDRINFO compile time test that Tom built into initdb.c the other
> day, so that it can fall through to this code.

Will do. BTW, when we are using getaddrinfo.c, is the gai_strerror
routine therein sufficient for Windows?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-25 02:39:27 Re: [HACKERS] Followup on the UnixWare Optimizer bug.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-25 01:58:04 TODO list comments

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-25 02:39:27 Re: [HACKERS] Followup on the UnixWare Optimizer bug.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-25 01:32:46 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support