Re: Arrays, placeholders, and column types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dan Sugalski <dan(at)sidhe(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Arrays, placeholders, and column types
Date: 2004-10-25 19:45:44
Message-ID: 22884.1098733544@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dan Sugalski <dan(at)sidhe(dot)org> writes:
> At 2:37 PM -0400 10/25/04, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What you'll need to do is specify at least one of
>> the array elements to be "numeric", either via paramTypes or with a cast
>> in the SQL command:
>>
>> INSERT INTO foo (bar, baz, xyzzy) VALUES ($1, $2, ARRAY[$3::numeric, $4, $5])

> Hrm. Okay, not a problem. (I was assuming the column type would be
> used to type the array, though I can see reasons to not do so)

Ideally it should be, but we haven't yet figured a reasonably clean way
to do it. The problem is that the type assignment is made bottom-up,
and only if it's still unknown when we get up to the INSERT level can we
use the INSERT column types to affect it. As a comparison point, if
you tried

INSERT ... VALUES($1 + $2)

you'd get a complaint about being unable to choose a plus operator,
even though you might think the system ought to infer that from the
datatype of the destination column.

> Is there any particular speed advantage to casting over setting
> paramTypes, or vice versa?

I doubt it would make any visible difference. Do what seems easiest for
your client code.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-25 19:47:35 Re: ON DELETE trigger blocks delete from my table
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-10-25 19:45:40 Re: PgSQL MVCC vs MySQL InnoDB