Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier
Date: 2003-04-02 20:25:58
Message-ID: 22819.1049315158@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Basically, one should only turn this variable on after giving up on the
>> possibility of getting any data out of the broken page itself. It would
>> be folly to run with it turned on as a normal setting.

> This statement should *definitely* go into the documentation for the
> option, then...

Andrew Sullivan expressed concern about this, too. The thing could
be made a little more failsafe if we made it impossible to set
ZERO_DAMAGED_PAGES to true in postgresql.conf, or by any means other
than an actual SET command --- whose impact would then be limited to
the current session. This is kind of an ugly wart on the GUC mechanism,
but I think not difficult to do with an assign_hook (it just has to
refuse non-interactive settings).

Comments?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-02 20:34:49 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-02 20:18:01 Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect).