| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Pimenov Yuri <proc(at)internet2(dot)ru>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: locale & glibc 2.2.2 |
| Date: | 2001-04-19 21:58:47 |
| Message-ID: | 22780.987717527@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> Of course not, it's not a bug - if this is a problem, it's a bug in
> Postgresql:
If glibc 2.2.2 sorts that way in C locale, then glibc is broken.
But I assume you meant this is the behavior in some other locale.
Postgres as such can cope just fine with non-C sort orders, but it
seems quite possible that the koi8 regression test sample outputs were
constructed using C-locale sort rules. Since the original complainant
merely asserted those tests were broken without defining what he meant
by broken, we're pretty much wasting our time speculating...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2001-04-19 22:01:13 | Re: locale & glibc 2.2.2 |
| Previous Message | Steve Wolfe | 2001-04-19 21:35:16 | Re: Delete w/ regexp |