Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?
Date: 2010-11-06 18:51:03
Message-ID: 22763.1289069463@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 11/06/2010 01:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What I *have* occasionally
>> wished for is that the buildfarm script would act more like make -k with
>> respect to the various test stages.

> I'm not sure that would be a great advance. Certainly, right now I'm
> going to be putting effort into the FTS stuff which I think should be
> much higher up your list of wants.

Agreed, that would be far more useful.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-06 18:56:49 knngist questions
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-11-06 18:45:53 Re: Should we use make -k on the buildfarm?