Re: Temp tables and LRU-K caching

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temp tables and LRU-K caching
Date: 2002-09-23 16:52:43
Message-ID: 22701.1032799963@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> What do we do now? The author clearly got it in before beta, but we are
> in beta now. I think we should apply it.

No. It's a feature addition and we are in feature freeze. Moreover,
it's an unreviewed feature addition (I certainly never had time to look
at the last version of the patch). Hold it for 7.4.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Koizar 2002-09-23 17:01:01 Re: [SQL] Monitoring a Query
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2002-09-23 16:40:54 Re: Temp tables and LRU-K caching