Re: Backward compatibility patch for numutils.c

From: "Markus Wollny" <Markus(dot)Wollny(at)computec(dot)de>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Backward compatibility patch for numutils.c
Date: 2004-07-04 21:18:50
Message-ID: 2266D0630E43BB4290742247C891057502B9D5E3@dozer.computec.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi!

Can noone give me any advice on whether to use this backward compatibility patch or not? I'm not a PG-hacker, so some better educated opinions would be very welcome. Thank you!

Kind regards,

Markus

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Markus Wollny
Sent: Wed 6/30/2004 20:05
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc:
Subject: [GENERAL] Backward compatibility patch for numutils.c
Hi!

We're using some "hardwired" apps which try to insert '' in INT-fields when what they really mean is NULL. 7.2 wasn't bothered by this behaviour, but 7.3 was and it broke some apps then. So Bruce had posted a patch for 7.3's /src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c - I couldn't find the original posting when someone asked some time ago and I cannot find it now, however I have reposted his patch there: http://groups.google.de/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=2266D0630E43BB4290742247C89105750393D53E%40dozer.computec.de

Now the relevant bit has slightly changed in 7.4.x and I wonder what else would be affected when applying the same thing here; I have made the same changes to the source of 7.4.3, resulting in the following diff:

diff numutils.c.patched numutils.c.orig
69,74c69,74
< else if (*s == 0)
< {
< /* 7.4.X workaround for broken apps */
< elog(WARNING, "pg_atoi: zero-length string");
< l = (long) 0;
< }
---
> if (*s == 0)
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
> errmsg("invalid input syntax for integer: \"%s\"",
> s)));
>

It compiles fine, but I don't know if I'd shoot myself in the foot when actually using and trusting the thus patched 7.4.3 in a production environment. Any thoughts? Or can I put my mind at rest regardless? I know it's breaking the SQL-specs, but I'd rather have that than broken apps...

Kind regards

Markus Wollny

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-05 03:31:22 My trip to Germany and Armenia
Previous Message Jean-Luc Lachance 2004-07-04 12:53:55 Re: [GENERAL] Major PG news article