| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] COPY view |
| Date: | 2006-08-23 17:48:15 |
| Message-ID: | 22540.1156355295@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Which is why you should leave the relation case alone and only add the
> different case. The relation case is already known to be good.
Well, a certain amount of refactoring of the code is inevitable unless
we want a lot of code duplication. But I don't see a reason to do
anything more to the relation-case code path than push some chunks of it
into subroutines.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-23 18:09:16 | Re: [PATCHES] COPY view |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-23 17:35:29 | Re: [PATCHES] COPY view |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-23 18:09:16 | Re: [PATCHES] COPY view |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-23 17:35:29 | Re: [PATCHES] COPY view |