| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Date: | 2009-04-09 16:26:56 |
| Message-ID: | 22439.1239294416@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>> Here is my thinking, and considering that that would basically involve a
>>> forward-looking design decision right now, I would support dropping the
>>> cardinality() function from 8.4 (if people agree that this is in fact the
>>> design decision to make).
>>
>> At this point I'd support that too.
> +1
Since there were no objections, and there is no time left before beta1,
I'm going to go ahead and remove cardinality().
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-04-09 16:29:19 | Re: Resetting cluster-wide statistics |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-04-09 16:26:52 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslash escaping not disabled inplpgsql |