| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Date: | 2009-04-09 17:42:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200904091742.n39HgaO23137@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> >>> Here is my thinking, and considering that that would basically involve a
> >>> forward-looking design decision right now, I would support dropping the
> >>> cardinality() function from 8.4 (if people agree that this is in fact the
> >>> design decision to make).
> >>
> >> At this point I'd support that too.
>
> > +1
>
> Since there were no objections, and there is no time left before beta1,
> I'm going to go ahead and remove cardinality().
Do we want a TODO?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-04-09 18:05:53 | Re: TODO item |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-04-09 16:55:24 | Re: hstore patch, part 2 |