Re: Patch for 8.5, transformationHook

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for 8.5, transformationHook
Date: 2009-08-10 18:40:47
Message-ID: 22335.1249929647@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Still, it rates pretty high on my astonishment scale that a
> COALESCE of two untyped NULLs (or for that matter, any two values of
> unknown type) returns a text value.

What would you have it do instead, throw an error?

The current behavior is a lot less astonishing for this example:
COALESCE('a', 'b')
which is the same from the type system's point of view.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-10 18:44:48 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #4961: pg_standby.exe crashes with no args
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-08-10 18:31:12 Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format