From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf |
Date: | 2002-03-22 17:24:59 |
Message-ID: | 2233.1016817899@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I think groups will give use the ability to add/remove connection from
> within the database. You just need to mention the group name in the
> config file.
Good point.
There's also the fact that people will probably start using one big
database divided into per-user schemas as soon as schema facilities
are available. So getting fancy with pg_hba controls at this point
may well prove to be like building a better buggy whip; good in its
own context but rendered irrelevant by events.
I agree with Bruce that group-level access controls in pg_hba seem
like a sufficient answer at this point. If it turns out not, we
can always improve further in future releases.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-03-22 17:34:38 | Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-03-22 17:19:15 | Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf |