Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf
Date: 2002-03-22 17:24:59
Message-ID: 2233.1016817899@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I think groups will give use the ability to add/remove connection from
> within the database. You just need to mention the group name in the
> config file.

Good point.

There's also the fact that people will probably start using one big
database divided into per-user schemas as soon as schema facilities
are available. So getting fancy with pg_hba controls at this point
may well prove to be like building a better buggy whip; good in its
own context but rendered irrelevant by events.

I agree with Bruce that group-level access controls in pg_hba seem
like a sufficient answer at this point. If it turns out not, we
can always improve further in future releases.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-03-22 17:34:38 Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-22 17:19:15 Re: Problem with reloading groups in pg_hba.conf