From: | Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] pg_regress fails at "point" test |
Date: | 2001-08-14 22:24:33 |
Message-ID: | 22189.997827873@nemeton.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30 Jul 2001 Tom Lane wrote:
> pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org writes:
> > gcc2.95; hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20, postgresql 7.1.2
> > make check checks the first group all right (tests check out ok and
> > a process "postgres:" shows up in the process list.
> > When "make check" displays "parallel group (18 tests): point lseg"
> > the "postgres:" process disappears from the process list and
> > the test does not complete. Or, rather, not until I lose
> > patience (15min). Incidentally the shell process that make started
> > keeps running and eats up all the CPU time.
>
> Known bug in HPUX's Bourne shell --- evidently it can't cope with so
> many children in parallel. It works if you do
>
> gmake SHELL=/bin/ksh check
>
> or if you run the non-parallel "installcheck". See FAQ_HPUX.
>
> If I still had a support contract in force with HP, I'd file a bug
> report...
I reduced the pg_regress script to a test case and submitted a CR:
JAGad84609 /usr/bin/sh hang on PostgreSQL regression test
The defect is filed against HP-UX 11i, but I noted that the defect is
present on 11.00 and 10.20 as well.
Regards,
Giles
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2001-08-14 22:38:36 | Re: [PATCHES] Makefile.PL for Pg.so |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-14 22:23:07 | Re: Re: Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators? |