Re: ssize_t vs win64

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ssize_t vs win64
Date: 2010-01-03 00:26:06
Message-ID: 22185.1262478366@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> OK, so my question is whether __int64 is the right definition or only
> what Python chose.

I see no reason to question either the width or the signedness.
If you do, feel free to research away.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-03 00:38:26 Re: ssize_t vs win64
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-01-03 00:07:49 Re: ssize_t vs win64