AW: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'chris(at)bitmead(dot)com'" <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: AW: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem
Date: 2000-02-08 16:49:09
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C603FDC240@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > What about portals? Doesn't psql use portals?
>
> No ... portals are a backend concept ...
>

I think the previous frontend "monitor" did use a portal for the
selects. The so called "blank portal".

I don't really see any advantage, that psql does not do a fetch loop
with a portal.
Is it possible in psql do do any "fetch" stuff, after doing a
select * from table ?

The result is fed to a pager anyway.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ole Gjerde 2000-02-08 17:23:35 COPY from file
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-08 16:41:58 Re: [HACKERS] Deferred trigger queue