WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
To: "'pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field
Date: 1998-03-05 09:26:28
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C6010A5203@sdexcsrv1.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >> Allowing text to use blobs for values larger than the current block
> size
> >> would hit the same problem.
> > When I told about multi-representation feature I ment that applications
> > will not be affected by how text field is stored - in tuple or somewhere
>
> > else. Is this Ok for you ?
>
> This is also what I would have in mind. But I guess a change to the fe-be
> protocol would still be necessary, since the client now allocates
> a fixed amount of memory to receive one tuple, wasn't it ?
>
> Andreas
>
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Martin 1998-03-05 12:16:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Problems with running v6.3 on DIGITAL UNIX
Previous Message Pedro J. Lobo 1998-03-05 09:11:17 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Problems with running v6.3 on DIGITAL UNIX