From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Update copyright for 2017 |
Date: | 2017-01-04 15:05:10 |
Message-ID: | 21837.1483542310@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2017-01-03 13:02:28 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Yeah, I was doing parallel pulls of different branches in git via shell
>> script, and it seems the size of this commit showed me that doesn't
>> work. Sorry.
> Shouldn't you check the results of something like this before pushing?
> Sorry for piling on, but that seems like a quite critical step.
Actually, my takeaway from this was "don't ever use git reset on the repo".
"git revert" would have been much safer. Yeah, it would have meant that
git blame on the 9.2 branch would have some useless noise, but how much
does anyone still care about that?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-01-04 15:08:18 | Re: pgsql: Update copyright for 2017 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-01-04 13:52:59 | pgsql: Better fix for sequence access in hot standby test |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2017-01-04 15:05:13 | Re: UNDO and in-place update |
Previous Message | web+postgresql | 2017-01-04 15:03:01 | BUG #14486: Inserting and selecting interval have different constraints |