Re: CVS HEAD compile failure

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CVS HEAD compile failure
Date: 2003-12-08 18:27:35
Message-ID: 21821.1070908055@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've been able to reproduce this on one of my machines, and it's nasty.

> In that case I'm confused about why this code compiles on my machine:

What compiler are you using? I'm using gcc 2.95.3 (on the machine that
shows the failure), and I think Bruce is also using something less than
the latest. It's possible that more recent gcc's are able to figure out
that the reference to free_func should be interpreted as a parameter
name and not a typedef.

In fact, trying your test program fails here:

$ gcc -Wall zzz.c
zzz.c:8: parse error before `free_func'
zzz.c:8: parse error before `)'
$

so "compiler difference" definitely seems to be the answer.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-12-08 18:33:09 Re: aggregate + view + alias crash on 7.4 stable
Previous Message ohp 2003-12-08 18:05:05 73.5 and uw 713