Re: Unions and Grouping

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Aaron Bono" <postgresql(at)aranya(dot)com>
Cc: "Postgres SQL language list" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unions and Grouping
Date: 2006-12-15 21:42:04
Message-ID: 21818.1166218924@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

"Aaron Bono" <postgresql(at)aranya(dot)com> writes:
> My question, what do the SQL Specifications say should happen on a Union?
> Is it supposed to eliminate duplicates even WITHIN the individual queries
> that are being unioned?

Yes. SQL92 7.10 saith:

b) If a set operator is specified, then the result of applying
the set operator is a table containing the following rows:

i) Let R be a row that is a duplicate of some row in T1 or of
some row in T2 or both. Let m be the number of duplicates
of R in T1 and let n be the number of duplicates of R in
T2, where m >= 0 and n >= 0.

ii) If ALL is not specified, then

Case:

1) If UNION is specified, then

Case:

A) If m > 0 or n > 0, then T contains exactly one dupli-
cate of R.

B) Otherwise, T contains no duplicate of R.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aaron Bono 2006-12-15 22:17:20 Re: Unions and Grouping
Previous Message Aaron Bono 2006-12-15 21:15:12 Unions and Grouping