From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Aaron Bono" <postgresql(at)aranya(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Postgres SQL language list" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unions and Grouping |
Date: | 2006-12-15 21:42:04 |
Message-ID: | 21818.1166218924@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
"Aaron Bono" <postgresql(at)aranya(dot)com> writes:
> My question, what do the SQL Specifications say should happen on a Union?
> Is it supposed to eliminate duplicates even WITHIN the individual queries
> that are being unioned?
Yes. SQL92 7.10 saith:
b) If a set operator is specified, then the result of applying
the set operator is a table containing the following rows:
i) Let R be a row that is a duplicate of some row in T1 or of
some row in T2 or both. Let m be the number of duplicates
of R in T1 and let n be the number of duplicates of R in
T2, where m >= 0 and n >= 0.
ii) If ALL is not specified, then
Case:
1) If UNION is specified, then
Case:
A) If m > 0 or n > 0, then T contains exactly one dupli-
cate of R.
B) Otherwise, T contains no duplicate of R.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aaron Bono | 2006-12-15 22:17:20 | Re: Unions and Grouping |
Previous Message | Aaron Bono | 2006-12-15 21:15:12 | Unions and Grouping |