| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| Date: | 2004-03-01 06:21:16 |
| Message-ID: | 21714.1078122076@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> C. BZ does not have any PG support in its default branch, and the RH port is
> currently unmaintained.
I was quite surprised to read this, and I'm sure Dave Lawrence (RH's BZ
maintainer) would be too. As would be the thousands of people who
regularly use bugzilla.redhat.com.
If you want to reject BZ because you don't like it, fine, but please
don't allege that it's unmaintained or that we'd have to put our own
resources into maintaining it. There *will* be BZ-on-PG running at Red
Hat for the foreseeable future. Obviously Dave would like to get the
port folded back upstream, and it looks like that will happen
eventually, but we need not fear being alone in running BZ-on-PG
meanwhile.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Shannon | 2004-03-01 08:23:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2004-03-01 01:41:32 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2004-03-01 07:14:22 | Re: Avoid MVCC using exclusive lock possible? |
| Previous Message | Jonathan Scott | 2004-03-01 05:42:34 | Re: Check Constraints and pg_dump |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Shannon | 2004-03-01 08:23:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2004-03-01 01:41:32 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Shannon | 2004-03-01 08:23:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| Previous Message | David Costa | 2004-03-01 04:31:28 | Re: Upgraded Site..any news ? |