Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zalman Stern <zalman(at)netcom(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length
Date: 1999-06-01 15:25:41
Message-ID: 21646.928250741@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> It'd probably be worthwhile to move NAMEDATALEN to config.h and make the
>> other two symbols be computed off NAMEDATALEN. Any objections if I
>> sneak that change into 6.5, or is it too close to being a "new feature"?

> Don't they have to be visible to outside apps, so it is in postgres_ext.h?

Good point --- I was thinking that postgres_ext.h includes config.h,
but I see it ain't so. You're right, those definitions must stay where
they are.

Still, I wonder why OIDNAMELEN isn't just defined as
(NAMEDATALEN+sizeof(Oid)) rather than putting a comment to that effect.
I will check the uses and see if that is a safe change or not.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-06-01 15:39:12 Re: [HACKERS] LIMITS
Previous Message Keala Jacobs 1999-06-01 15:18:06 using variables with postgres