| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: tsearch2 documentation done |
| Date: | 2007-09-14 04:52:56 |
| Message-ID: | 21643.1189745576@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I am now satisified with the tsearch2 documentation in SGML and have
>> marked the item as complete for 8.3.
> what's about examples ? They certainly need updating.
Bruce might be satisfied, but I'm not ... feel free to hack away on the docs.
> For example, http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/textsearch-rule-dictionary-example.html
> need to change
I'd much prefer to see the C-code examples pushed out to contrib
modules. There is no way we can test or maintain things that are
embedded in SGML examples.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-09-14 06:14:53 | Re: Another HOT thought: why do we need indcreatexid at all? |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2007-09-14 04:44:13 | Re: tsearch2 documentation done |