Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial
Date: 2003-08-02 14:50:31
Message-ID: 21643.1059835831@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Uh, PHP isn't GPL, as of PHP4, http://www.php.net/license/

Consider also that if you have hopes of plPHP someday being included in
the standard Postgres distribution, it'll need to be BSD-licensed.

(Including PLs in the standard distro strikes me as a good idea, BTW.
They usually need maintenance along with the core backend code.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jochem van Dieten 2003-08-02 16:29:19 Re: Domains (Was [PERFORM] Views With Unions)
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2003-08-02 13:42:05 Re: Help with BEGIN/COMMIT within a transaction