Re: GIN fast insert

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIN fast insert
Date: 2009-02-13 15:18:29
Message-ID: 2159.1234538309@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> writes:
> Do you think we need to add new pg_am boolean option? Like pg_am.amcangettuple
> or pg_am.amcanpertuplescan

I think it's sufficient to mark this by setting amgettuple to zero.

We might as well allow amgetbitmap to be zero, too, to mark the case
where the AM doesn't want to support bitmap scans.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-02-13 15:41:44 Re: GIN fast insert
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-02-13 14:49:56 Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security